Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!yeshua.marcam.com!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!caen!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel Date: 4 Mar 1994 19:21:51 GMT Organization: Montana State University, Bozeman MT Lines: 28 Message-ID: <2l81of$rmp@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <2l4r3i$cb6@hq.hq.af.mil> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu In article <2l4r3i$cb6@hq.hq.af.mil>, Leslie D. Peters SrA <lpeters@scratchy.hq.af.mil> wrote: >We have 3 i486's running NetBSD 0.9, and we are experiencing mysterious >crashs, filesystem self-destructions, etc. How stable is the FreeBSD >1.* line FreeBSD 1.1 is more stable than any other public release of *BSD you'll find. It will be out in a couple weeks (in BETA now), though if you're interested in being a BETA tester check out the announcement in comp.os.386bsd.announce. The BETA release has some file-system permission problems and a couple little kernel bugs that affect fd and aha542 users but they are now in the tree and I believe new install disks are going to be made RSN. >and is there going to be a NetBSD 1.0 ? Your guess is as good as mine. I've not heard a peep about it even when I've asked the NetBSD developers. Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | FreeBSD core member and all around tech. nate@cs.montana.edu | weenie. work #: (406) 994-4836 | Graduating May '94 with a BS in EE home #: (406) 586-0579 | - looking for work in CS/EE field.