*BSD News Article 28032


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!MathWorks.Com!panix!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!swrinde!ihnp4.ucsd.edu!library.ucla.edu!csulb.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Subject: Re: Stable *BSD for Intel
Message-ID: <hastyCM9CHI.Lsy@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
References: <2l71jpEr19@uni-erlangen.de> <hastyCM5Jqn.513@netcom.com> <2lcs8t$ffq@fw.novatel.ca>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 1994 19:22:30 GMT
Lines: 49

In article <2lcs8t$ffq@fw.novatel.ca> hpeyerl@sidney (Herb Peyerl) writes:
>Amancio Hasty Jr (hasty@netcom.com) wrote:
>: Perhaps the above is due to cabling problems with the AHA-1542C;nevertheless,
>: I suggest that one of the NetBSD-0.9 advocates take a snapshot of a stable 
>: netbsd-current and release it. Given that the release date of
>: NetBSD-1.0 is unknown.
>
>Ummm... This has been happening for a while now:
>
>sun-lamp.cs.berkeley.edu:pub/NetBSD/arch/i386
>
>[sun-lamp i386 72 ]> ls
>CKSUMS                  netbsd-ahbbt*           usr.libexec.tar.gz
>README                  sbin.tar.gz             usr.misc.tar.gz
>bin.tar.gz              usr.bin.tar.gz          usr.sbin.tar.gz
>dev.tar.gz              usr.games.tar.gz        usr.share.tar.gz
>etc.tar.gz              usr.include.tar.gz      var.tar.gz
>netbsd-aha*             usr.lib.tar.gz
>
>Here's an excerpt from the README:
>
>This is a binary snapshot, created from the NetBSD-current sources
>as of evening, 3/4/94.  They should be used in the same was as all
>-current sources: VERY CAREFULLY, and only by those who know what
>they're doing.
>

Sounds good, however, hardly my definition of a *stable* release
of netbsd-current. 


Now, is there a top-level Readme file pointing to it --- the reason
why I am saying this is because I have seen a few postings about
kernel crashes with netbsd-0.9 when I know that netbsd-current is 
not that bad. People innocently just pick up netbsd-0.9 thinking
that is the more stable netbsd --- which can be true pending
on the weeks netbsd-current build. I was quoted that the netbsd-current
release is mostly for  developers;due to the high overhead of keeping up
with netbsd-current -- shortly there after I installed FreeBSD.

Ideally, netbsd-0.9 should be deleted and replaced by netbsd-0.9xxx. 

So once again, if one of the netbsd advocates can make available a known
*stable* snapshot.
-- 
FREE unix, gcc, tcp/ip, X, open-look, interviews, tcl/tk, MIME, midi, sound
at  freebsd.cdrom.com:/pub/FreeBSD
Amancio Hasty,  Consultant |
Home: (415) 495-3046       |  
e-mail hasty@netcom.com	   |  ftp-site depository of all my work:    
ahasty@cisco.com           |  sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/X