Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!MathWorks.Com!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!festival!edcogsci!richard From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) Subject: Re: Coexisting on the PC Message-ID: <CLzu0M.J9s@cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Organization: HCRC, University of Edinburgh References: <CLz6un.A9G@rex.uokhsc.edu> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 1994 16:05:10 GMT Lines: 12 In article <CLz6un.A9G@rex.uokhsc.edu> benjamin-goldsteen@uokhsc.edu writes: > I have a proposition: I think the devices for 386BSD should renamed >to better conform to the PC. I disagree. To many of us, consistency with MSDOS is worthless. It's consistency with the rest of BSD that matters. -- Richard -- Richard Tobin, HCRC, Edinburgh University R.Tobin@ed.ac.uk "We demand guaranteed rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty" - HHGTTG