Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!flatlin!bad From: bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org (Christoph Badura) Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!! Organization: Guru Systems/Funware Department Date: Tue, 28 Jul 1992 21:31:56 GMT Message-ID: <1992Jul28.213156.15525@flatlin.ka.sub.org> References: <1992Jul24.185653.3196@kithrup.COM> <1992Jul27.164228.28312@gateway.novell.com> <1992Jul27.193757.3628@kithrup.COM> <1992Jul27.213657.29545@gateway.novell.com> Lines: 21 In <1992Jul27.213657.29545@gateway.novell.com> terry@npd.Novell.COM (Terry Lambert) writes: >In article <1992Jul27.193757.3628@kithrup.COM> sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes: >>In article <1992Jul27.164228.28312@gateway.novell.com> terry@npd.Novell.COM (Terry Lambert) writes: >>>1) SysVr3.x has got to be SVR3.2 or later. It didn't include streams >>> prior to that. >> >>Some platforms had STREAMS as early as SysVr3.0. >They were either retrofits of non-AT&T code (like SCO and Unisys' use of >the Lachman code), or other independant developement. *None* of my source >tapes from AT&T prior to SVR3.2 show streams source from AT&T. AT&T shipped it with R3.1 for the 3b2. I have worked with STREAMS on a M68K port of R3 that predates the release of 3.2. If I remember correctly, the 3.2 release was for the i386 only anyway. Atleast, that was what I read from the announcement. -- Christoph Badura --- bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org UNIX is a trademark of LEBEDA & Co, Ges.m.b.H, Vienna, Austria