Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!hp9000.csc.cuhk.hk!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!news.netmbx.de!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!news.funet.fi!kannel!news From: ats@lut.fi (Ari Suutari) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: Do YOU think that this generates correct kernel ? Keywords: kernel config Message-ID: <1992Jul29.091608.10321@lut.fi> Date: 29 Jul 92 09:16:08 GMT References: <1992Jul28.151518.18102@lut.fi> <1992Jul28.221939.2479@cognos.com> Sender: news@lut.fi (Usenet News) Organization: Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland Lines: 24 dealwisb@cognos.com (Brian de Alwis) writes: >controller wd0 at isa? >disk dk0 at wd0 drive 0 >disk dk1 at wd0 drive 1 >NWD is defined as 1 (which breaks the patches posted to support > 1 HD). >It seems that config is looking in the wrong places to figure out the >number of possibly-attached devices. I think that config works correctly, it just that naming of devices should be different. How about doing it like this: controller wdc0 at isa? disk wd0 at wc0 drive 0 disk wd1 at wc0 drive 1 This would, of cource, require some changes. wd.c should be wdc.c and files.i386 should be modified also. All references to NWD should also be checked and modified to NWDC if required. Now config would configure swap386bsd.c also correctly. Ari