Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!news.byu.edu!cwis.isu.edu!u.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps Subject: Re: Anyone ported scheme? Date: 9 Feb 1994 07:23:23 GMT Organization: Weber State University, Ogden, UT Lines: 20 Message-ID: <2ja31b$4af@u.cc.utah.edu> References: <2ip2gh$3q1@news.csus.edu> <MYCROFT.94Feb7200148@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.weber.edu In article <MYCROFT.94Feb7200148@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu> mycroft@duality.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Charles Hannum) writes: [ ... re: anyone ported MIT Scheme 7.3? ... ] >I ported Scheme 7.2 to 386BSD about a year ago; the binaries are still >available in martigny.ai.mit.edu:/pub/scheme-7.2/386bsd.tar.Z. I will >probably get to touching up 7.3 for NetBSD this weekend, and will make >a new set of binaries (linked statically). Is there a particular reason for the binary-only packaging? I'm personally not interested in Scheme for my own use, but there are several Scheme nuts at this site. Is it a restriction on modified sources, or a "must not modify" clause or something? Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.