Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!sdd.hp.com!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!help.cc.iastate.edu!michaelv From: michaelv@iastate.edu (Michael L. VanLoon) Subject: Re: emacs type editor wanted Message-ID: <michaelv.712272562@help.cc.iastate.edu> Keywords: emacs no_vi Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA References: <1992Jul25.223126.26886@NeoSoft.com> <1992Jul26.054027.28848@coe.montana.edu> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 21:29:22 GMT Lines: 21 In <1992Jul26.054027.28848@coe.montana.edu> osynw@warp.mhd.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes: >In article <1992Jul25.223126.26886@NeoSoft.com> gclarkii@NeoSoft.com (Gary Clark II) writes: >>I'm trying to find a emacs type editor that has already been ported to >>the 0.1 version of 386BSD. I can get GNU Emacs, but I'm trying to avoid >>the size (I only have about 30 megs free...). I really do hate vi though. >I just ported (not really) uemacs 3.11a to 386BSD. I grabbed the source >I had for the DECstation, and I had to change two lines in one of the >files to include <sys/ioctl_compat.h> just before <sys/ioctl.h>, and >things compiled w/out a hitch. This is the second piece of software I've seen that needed this (the other was an ircII client I was compiling). Is there any good reason why <sys/ioctl.h> shouldn't just include <sys/ioctl_compat.h> by default for every compile? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael L. VanLoon "Ignorance is bliss..." michaelv@iastate.edu -- Computer Engineering, Iowa State University ------------------------------------------------------------------------------