Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!apollo.hp.com!netnews From: sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com (Bill Sommerfeld) Subject: Re: [NetBSD] Running on a 2Meg machine. Sender: usenet@apollo.hp.com (Usenet News) Message-ID: <CJFCwL.1sK@apollo.hp.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 1994 17:36:20 GMT References: <2gpi0m$f5b@fw.novatel.ca> <1994Jan10.083325.9481@news.cs.indiana.edu> <DERAADT.94Jan10081443@newt.fsa.ca> Nntp-Posting-Host: snarfblatt.ch.apollo.hp.com Organization: Hewlett Packard, Chelmsford Site Lines: 18 In article <DERAADT.94Jan10081443@newt.fsa.ca>, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@fsa.ca> wrote: >kerberos master? *chuckle* > seriously, i don't know how fast a kerberos server should be MIT's primary kerberos server was a Microvax II for the longest time. The one at MIT only needed to handle between 2 and 4 requests per second at the busiest time per day. >name server (ie. BIND) > why not? it'd make a great secondary... Well, it depends on the size of the zones served by the machine.. since named uses an in-core database, it may take a while to start if the zone is bigger than the available physical memory. - Bill