Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!uunet!noc.near.net!das-news.harvard.edu!honeydew.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!aw2t+ From: "Alex R.N. Wetmore" <aw2t+@andrew.cmu.edu> Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.development Subject: Re: Whats up with the OS/2 port of NetBSD? Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1993 17:34:31 -0500 Organization: Junior, Math/Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 22 Message-ID: <0h8pRri00WB5I1N2YQ@andrew.cmu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: po5.andrew.cmu.edu In-Reply-To: <pcbsdCIu94s.766@netcom.com> Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.386bsd.development: 30-Dec-93 Re: Whats up with the OS/2 .. by PCBSD D. Manager@netcom. > IBM is redesigning the internals of OS/2 to provide something similar > to what Microsoft promoses for NT - subsystems. Theoretically, the > new OS/2 will have an ability to plug-and-use subsystems such as > POSIX, DOS, etc. Actually, IBM is using carnegie mellon's Mach system, which already has this (it is a microkernel, which is what he is referring to when he talks about "subsystems"). This basically makes a minimal o/s at the core layer (offering multitasking/threading, memory services, and ipc), and have other operating systems (called servers) running on top of this. These servers allow more computer operating systems to run on top of the microkernel (even multiple systems at one time). For instance there are currently a BSD system and an MS-DOS system running on top side-by-side (as well as other systems). IBM is porting their workplace o/s to this. For more info you should read some of the papers on x29.mach.cs.cmu.edu. the OSF is also using the mach MK in their microkernel o/s. alex