Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!uunet!psinntp!gmhgate!cbp From: cbp@gmhgate.gmh.edu (Christopher Preston) Subject: Re: AT&T vs. BSDI --> 4.3BSD-NET2 distribution requires AT&T license!!! Message-ID: <1992Jul25.051037.17727@gmhgate.gmh.edu> Organization: Grady Memorial Hospital References: <1992Jul21.104627.3353@mel.dit.csiro.au> <1992Jul21.131433.16450@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> <2cHS02Pi1bvx01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 05:10:37 GMT Lines: 32 In article <2cHS02Pi1bvx01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> gab10@griffincd.amdahl.com (Gary A Browning) writes: >In article <1992Jul21.131433.16450@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg>, >eoahmad@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg (Othman Ahmad) writes: >> In article <1992Jul21.104627.3353@mel.dit.csiro.au >smart@wanda.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU (Robert Smart) writes: >> >>> This is insanity. Surely this will be thrown out of court. >> Who is going to defend NET/2? > >The person/organization AT&T might sue in the future over NET/2. > > >I like the idea of sending letters of complaint to AT&T explaining >why you have requested changing your long-distance carrier. Seems like >fair play in light of AT&T's tactics. > What about sending letters to the Judge? Address? Though loosing a few customers might not mean much to AT&T, how about several hundred or a thousand letters to the judge (respectfully) expressing concern and perhaps a little anger over AT&T's unfair attempt at monopolization, with brief summaries of some of the points in the last hundred or so articles? cbp --- -- Christopher Preston | I represent no opinions but my own. Datacommunications | Grady Memorial Hospital | "Let them eat pork rinds" - G. Bush