Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!caen!uunet!hela.iti.org!wotan.iti.org!scs
From: scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons)
Subject: Re: USL vs. BSDI, and what to do
Message-ID: <scs.712004511@wotan.iti.org>
Sender: usenet@iti.org (Hela USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: wotan.iti.org
Organization: Industrial Technology Institute
References: <1992Jul21.131433.16450@ntuix.ntu.ac.sg> <2cHS02Pi1bvx01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> <l6vrqvINN91g@neuro.usc.edu> <l6vt9sINN93u@neuro.usc.edu> <1992Jul24.170447.11039@Warren.MENTORG.COM>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1992 19:01:51 GMT
Lines: 13
tal@Warren.MENTORG.COM (Tom Limoncelli) writes:
>I hate to say this, but [AT&T] has nothing to do with this. AT&T didn't
>bring the law suit. USL did. USL has a different chair person, and
>has their own lawyers (from what I've heard, they don't share lawyers...
>so much for the "army of lawyers").
But AT&T is the majority owner of USL. You can bet any extremity you
care to name that if AT&T is hurt by the actions of USL, something will
get done about it.
--
"I was disqualified when I mooed at a propane tank mistaking it for a cow."
Patrick E Fleming, pfleming@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu