Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.periphs.scsi:15516 comp.os.386bsd.questions:7050 comp.unix.osf.osf1:1458 Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.unix.osf.osf1 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!psgrain!neon!pluto!perryh From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) Subject: Re: Driver for Adaptec 274xT Message-ID: <CGszo0.L6p@pluto.rain.com> Followup-To: comp.os.386bsd.questions Organization: Surely you jest References: <CGDFu3.477@tfs.com> <2c09tq$mji@homer.cs.mcgill.ca> <CGEzD8.GJH@tsoft.net> <2ccjep$n5d@u.cc.utah.edu> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1993 18:35:59 GMT Lines: 7 In <2ccjep$n5d@u.cc.utah.edu> terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes: > I decided to finally break down and buy a >*yetch*< Intel based machine ... > (prior to that time, I was installing on miscellaneous unused 386 and > 486 hardware). Huh? Aren't the 386 and 486 Intel processors? Doesn't that make all 386 and 486 systems "Intel based"?