*BSD News Article 24080


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.periphs.scsi:15372 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6925 comp.unix.osf.osf1:1415
Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.unix.osf.osf1
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!world!hd
From: hd@world.std.com (HD Associates)
Subject: Re: Driver for Adaptec 274xT
Message-ID: <CGLJGA.KLL@world.std.com>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References: <1993Nov9.163202.2387@chpc.org> <CGDFu3.477@tfs.com> <2cavef$adl@mckinley.cit.macalstr.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1993 18:02:33 GMT
X-Original-Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.unix.osf.osf1
Lines: 84

In article <2cavef$adl@mckinley.cit.macalstr.edu>,
Scott Ferris <sferris@budapest.math.macalstr.edu> wrote:
>Julian Elischer (julian@TFS.COM) wrote:
>> In article <1993Nov9.163202.2387@chpc.org>, Heas <heas@chpc.org> wrote:
>> >hi all,
(...)
>>  I wrote most of the 386bsd(etc) SCSI drivers and I'd LOVE to write a driver
>>  for the 274x, but adaptec are keeping the interface secret
>>  you have to:
>>  1/ Pay money
>>  2/ sign non-disclosure..
>
>
>   I have just received a copy of the AHA-2740 series Technical Reference
>manual, and the AIC-7770 Data Book (Preliminary).  While I did make
>about 9 calls to Adaptec Literature and 1 to Tech Support trying
>to get docs, at no point was I asked to sign an NDA or anything else.
>The problem I always ran into was that no one could find a listing
>for the documents I was requesting. Given the Preliminary label on the 
>Data Book, it would appear Adaptec's failure to privide docs earlier was 
>because they weren't written yet, rather than because of any new policy.  
>
>   I didn't have to pay a dime for them either.  
>I suggest you check your sources more carefully.
>
>>  hmm another good company shoots itself in the foot (head?)
>
>  With slow doc writers, perhaps.  They also seems to have problems
>with misinformed Usenet News posters.  :)

Adaptec has earned any bad Usenet press they get.

It took six weeks to get the 174x documentation from Adaptec, even
though it was published (To be fair, I wasn't chasing them as aggressively
as I could have... I would let it slide until I thought
of it and got angry again).  I went through three cycles of:

Adaptec Literature Department: We'll send it within 10 days
(10 days)
Adaptec Literature Department: We don't have a record of the
request...
Me: I need it, I'll pay for it, I'll give you my
federal express number...
Adaptec Literature Department: We aren't set up to handle that;
we'll send it within 10 days...

When it got near the time I really needed the stuff, I contacted
someone in OEM sales (this was for an OEM application), and
they FED EXd me the stuff with apologies.

Working with Adaptec, Part 2:  This was to be a target mode application
on EISA.  Adpatec Pre Sales Support suggested the 174x to a client
as a solution to their target requirements, and then they
contracted with me to do a driver for them.

In a nut shell: The 174x doesn't work in target mode, the
documentation is incomplete on target mode,
and finally, Adaptec now says they will not support ANY host adapter in
target mode, AND, worst of all, it took several months of working with
Adaptec before they would flatly say they weren't going to fix or
support the advertised capabilities of the board.

(to cheer me up, the same week that the letter came saying Adaptec
does not support target mode on any host adapter, I received the 174x
manuals from the literature department.  This was around September
after requesting them in March).

There are a number of people within Adaptec who were a
pleasure to work with, and I don't question their desire to help or the
technical competence of their engineering department for a minute.

However, the company hung my client out to dry after selling them
on the board in the first place, and constantly battering Adaptec with
memos and phone calls to get them to do anything was an
experience I don't want anyone else to go through.

Peter

P.S.: I'm really interested to know if the 2740 documentation discusses
a processor target mode of operation.
-- 
Peter Dufault               Real Time Machine Control and Simulation
HD Associates               Voice: 508 433 6936
hd@world.std.com            Fax:   508 433 5267