Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!EU.net!ieunet!news.ieunet.ie!jkh From: jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: Status on discussed merge between NetBSD and FreeBSD Date: 16 Nov 1993 05:03:41 GMT Organization: Dublin, Ireland Lines: 19 Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.93Nov15210342@whisker.lotus.ie> References: <JKH.93Nov13222001.2@whisker.lotus.ie> <crt.753292942@tiamat.umd.umich.edu> <CGD.93Nov14085627@eden.cs.berkeley.edu> <CGHs3y.Au2@kithrup.com> <DERAADT.93Nov14110240@pain.agate> <35237@ksr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: whisker.lotus.ie In-reply-to: jfw@ksr.com's message of 15 Nov 93 13:57:38 EST In article <35237@ksr.com> jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods) writes: I was personally dismayed to see the recent article crowing about FreeBSD finally having shared libraries, in an article that made it appear that this was a FreeBSD-specific development; I was also dismayed to see another recent I'm sorry? I think that's my post you're talking about, and all I did was have the temerity to state that we'd finally gotten shared libraries in fairly good shape. I just re-read it, and nowhere can I see that it in any way intimated that this was a FreeBSD specific state of affairs. I cannot speak on behalf of NetBSD, so the only developments I'm at all qualified to discuss are those in FreeBSD. Please - things are bad enough at the moment without reading negative things into even my *positive* posts! :) Jordan -- (Jordan K. Hubbard) jkh@violet.berkeley.edu, jkh@al.org, jkh@whisker.lotus.ie