*BSD News Article 23981


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.help:8865 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6878
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!howland.reston.ans.net!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat.org!kf8nh!bsa
From: bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org (Brandon S. Allbery)
Subject: Re: SUMMARY: FreeBSD vs. Linux
References: <2bs065$1gd@news.cs.tulane.edu> <fenCGIzuK.K5J@netcom.com>
Organization: Brandon's Linux box and AmPR node, Mentor, OH
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 1993 16:42:16 GMT
Message-ID: <1993Nov15.164216.5591@kf8nh.wariat.org>
Lines: 19

In article <fenCGIzuK.K5J@netcom.com> fen@netcom.com (Fen Labalme) writes:
>I am very surprised that I just read 33 responses comparing Linux and
>Free/NetBSD and I saw no mention of one of the best reasons I know of
>to be using Linux:
>
>	Linux is the only one of the bunch that is copylefted !!
>	~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ahem.  Some people *prefer* the terms of the BSD copyright.

Is there any particular reason, aside from egotism, why the Linux and *BSD
communities *have* to bicker at each other instead of cooperating?  (Not that
almost ten years of experience with Usenet BSD egotism makes me hopeful...)

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery	   kf8nh@kf8nh.ampr.org		 bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org
"MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years
of careful development."  ---dmeggins@aix1.uottawa.ca