*BSD News Article 23881


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!cgd
From: cgd@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU (Chris G. Demetriou)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc
Subject: Re: Status on discussed merge between NetBSD and FreeBSD
Date: 14 Nov 93 10:53:44
Organization: Kernel Hackers 'r' Us
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <CGD.93Nov14105344@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <JKH.93Nov13222001.2@whisker.lotus.ie> <CGD.93Nov14085627@eden.cs.berkeley.edu>
	<CGHs3y.Au2@kithrup.com> <CGD.93Nov14100033@eden.cs.berkeley.edu>
	<CGHv40.BKF@kithrup.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eden.cs.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: sef@kithrup.com's message of Sun, 14 Nov 1993 18:23:43 GMT

In article <CGHv40.BKF@kithrup.com> sef@kithrup.com (Sean Eric Fagan) writes:
>>Or perhaps some details from Jordan
>>as to why FreeBSD decided to make this announcement...
>
>I think you already know that.  Or did you think that removing CVS access
>for only the freebsd folks was going to have no ramifications?

If that was their reasoning, perhaps they should have made it public.
Ahh, Mr. Big (Mouth) is making himself spokesman for FreeBSD?

Also, i'd be more inclined to believe your argument if the chronology
were what you claimed.  Jordan's note was posted to .announce at:
13 Nov 1993 22:31:38 -0800.  CVS access on lamp for FreeBSD developers
not working on the NetBSD source tree at 22:40 (-0800, 13 November).
How do i know?  well, i'm looking at the ctime of a file that i chmodded
when their access went away.  You can't call it a response if it happens
before what it's responding to.  "cause and effect; logic 101."

Note that people working on FreeBSD who *are* working on NetBSD
did not have their access to NetBSD's CVS tree denied.  Only those
who are doing no work on NetBSD cannot access our CVS tree.
Therefore, you can't claim that we're kicking people out of our
tree because they work with (or even mostly with) FreeBSD; that's
just not true.  If they're not working on NetBSD, then they don't
have access; plain and simple.



chris
--
chris g. demetriou                                   cgd@cs.berkeley.edu

                    smarter than your average clam.