Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!msuinfo!netnews.upenn.edu!jake.esu.edu!kender From: kender@executor (System Overlord) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: SUMMARY: FreeBSD vs. Linux Message-ID: <2c1nh8$nka@jake.esu.edu> Date: 13 Nov 93 04:24:08 GMT References: <2brq1b$a8j@news.ysu.edu> <2btv9t$4nb@news.cs.tulane.edu> <2bui0j$blb@fw.novatel.ca> <1993Nov12.001546.6267@midway.uchicago.edu> Reply-To: kender@esu.edu Organization: The Executor Lines: 28 NNTP-Posting-Host: babbage.esu.edu Slaving away in a dark room, orc@pell.chi.il.us (Orc) produced: >In article <2bui0j$blb@fw.novatel.ca>, Herb Peyerl <hpeyerl@novatel.ca> wrote: > [stuff that makes me think that there should be a .advocacy group for >linux and/or <x>bsd] > >>Run it on an Amiga > : >>Run real shared libraries. > > > These two are not true. Are you so sure of that? A friend of mine is running NetBSD downstairs right now on his amiga, even as I type this up on my roommate's Linux machine (in fact, we are going to be messing with slip and ppp between our two machines over the next couple of days/weeks, depending on how our class workload goes ;). As for the shared libraries, I seem to recall a number of people mentioning that shared libs are being tested right now, if not fully released. D -- |Dan Garcia,Kender@esu.edu|If privacy is outlawed then only outlaws will have | |#include <stdisclaimer.h>| privacy - Phil Zimmerman, author of PGP | |Coram Deo|Death to Barney| This space for rent - mail ideas to me -- | | GCS/MU d--() -p+ c++(c+) l++ u+ e+(*) m++(*) s !n h f+ !g w+ t++(--) r+ !y |