*BSD News Article 23728


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12934 comp.os.386bsd.development:1430 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1803 comp.os.386bsd.apps:674 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6765 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1495
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!pv34b0.vincent.iastate.edu!shad
From: shad@iastate.edu (Hanse ShadowSpawn)
Subject: Re: Evidence to the moderators conflict-of-interest
Message-ID: <shad.752994007@pv34b0.vincent.iastate.edu>
Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
References: <CGD.93Nov10041331@eden.CS.Berkeley.EDU> <jmonroyCGB3J9.IK2@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1993 05:00:07 GMT
Lines: 53


This discussion is getting ridiculous (sp?).  (BTW: My spelling and grammar
may not be excellent, I've been up for roughly 22 hours.)  
I know that many people have suggested that we just ignore this
conversation which I agree is the best course, but I couldn't help
myself. 

 Jesus:  A comment about someone's poor grammar (from your point of
         view) is not a proper response to an argument or statement by
	 another person.  Perhaps an argumentation/debate/discussion
	 class could help teach you that.  Try well-founded arguments,
	 cite facts, examples, etc., and not say (paraphrased) "Failure
	 to do such-and-such is proof of your conflict-of-interest."
	 From what I can tell from what you're saying, if the moderator
         defends himself in any way shape or form it is a conflict of
         interest.  Have you ever walked into a court room and seen a
         defendant being told he has no right to defend himself?  I
         highly doubt it...not in America anyway.  I have heard nothing
         out of Chris but reasonable explanations of what he's done and
         calm, cool responses to your ranting and raving.  You don't
	 sound like someone who's trying to argue a legitimate point,
	 you sound like a little baby kicking and screaming because he
	 wants his way, or at least like a bully saying 'give me what I
	 want or else'.  You don't listen with any kind of open mind it
	 doesn't seem you even care what Chris (and since this "discussion"
	 has continued for so long, anybody else) has said.  "Why do you
	 write these horrible sentences?" is not a decent response.  It
         is a child's way of confronting an issue or statement for which
	 he has no reply.  I had no trouble at all with any of the messages
	 Chris sent (reading them that is).  If you can't read them as
	 posted, read them as if he were speaking to you.  There are some
	 sentences which simply aren't worth the time to translate from
	 the way they were meant to be spoken and the way they should be
	 written to get the emotions across.

Anyway, I've rambled on long enough on this issue.  Chris seems to be
argueing in a professional manner.  Jesus is spending too much time
bickering (bickering != argueing) and picking fights.  Pay attention to
what is being said, not what is being typed in to the computer.  Read,
listen, and think before responding.

Actually, as I'm fairly new to the newsgroups I'm unclear on a certain
point.  Is this the place for this discussion?  It actually sounds like
it's more appropriate for alt.flame.  Maybe it's just me, but I read
this group to hear about *BSD apps, upgrades, etc., and not to hear ONE
PERSON (not a group, just one person) yelling to overthrough the current
moderator of another newsgroup.

-----------------------Marcus I. Ryan (shad@iastate.edu)----------------------
"Republicans understand the importance of bondage between a mother and child."
                                -- Vice President Dan Quayle 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------