Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:12915 comp.os.386bsd.development:1412 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1785 comp.os.386bsd.apps:656 comp.os.386bsd.questions:6728 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1464 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!crcnis1.unl.edu!wupost!udel!gatech!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!library.ucla.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!u.cc.utah.edu!cs.weber.edu!terry From: terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.os.386bsd.development,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.apps,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: [RFD] Part II: Election of a new moderator Date: 10 Nov 1993 23:37:20 GMT Organization: Weber State University, Ogden, UT Lines: 27 Message-ID: <2brtvg$q5s@u.cc.utah.edu> References: <jmonroyCG9vD5.KG1@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.weber.edu In article <jmonroyCG9vD5.KG1@netcom.com> jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr) writes: > > RFD > Request For Discussion > > PART II > Election of a new moderator In deference to the actually coherent (if not relevant to the chosen venue) postings you have made in the past (as a tiny percentage of the total postings you have made), I will not pull apart your use of 4 of the 7 well known logical fallacies in your arguments bit by bit. Suffice it to say, you have used: 1) False Cause 2) Excluded Middle 3) Appeal to Authority 4) Begging the Question (St. Thomas Aquinas' Assumed Conclusion) Please: either get it right, or avoid future attempts at syllogism. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.