Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:6611 comp.os.386bsd.bugs:1748 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1408 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!Germany.EU.net!mcsun!ieunet!news.ieunet.ie!jkh From: jkh@whisker.lotus.ie (Jordan K. Hubbard) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.bugs,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-1.0R] Epsilon -> Release patches - problems Date: 09 Nov 1993 08:29:15 GMT Organization: Lotus Development Ireland Lines: 18 Distribution: world Message-ID: <JKH.93Nov9002915@whisker.lotus.ie> References: <g89r4222.752427162@kudu> <2bc56h$h1p@pdq.coe.montana.edu> <CG5nMw.Gnq@latcs1.lat.oz.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: whisker.lotus.ie In-reply-to: wongm@latcs5.lat.oz.au's message of Mon, 8 Nov 1993 04:11:19 GMT In article <CG5nMw.Gnq@latcs1.lat.oz.au> wongm@latcs5.lat.oz.au (M.C. Wong) writes: But after make world, I did build a new kernel before rebooting (as from the upgrade instruction) and when it reboots up, it still says FreeBSD-1.0e in the header before probing for devices. And I confirmed that by logging in and use : uname -a. Should it be something like FreeBSD-1.0R or 1.0r ? Yes, it should (we've actually gone to numbers now, so it should have been 1.0.0), but in the rush someone forgot to bump the version number! Whoops! Jordan -- (Jordan K. Hubbard) jkh@violet.berkeley.edu, jkh@al.org, jkh@whisker.lotus.ie I do not speak for Lotus, nor am I even a Lotus employee. I am an independent contractor.