Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!usenet.coe.montana.edu!osyjm From: osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Ultrastore vs Adaptec Date: 7 Nov 1993 22:53:00 GMT Organization: Computer Science, MSU, Bozeman MT, 59717 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <2bju8c$2ee@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <4gr0ukG00iV2EBDVJd@andrew.cmu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: schizo.coe.montana.edu In article <4gr0ukG00iV2EBDVJd@andrew.cmu.edu>, Timothy J Kniveton <tim+@CMU.EDU> wrote: >Ultrastore 34F vs Adaptec 1742: which is better? > >I would think Adaptec, since it is EISA and 34F is VLB: but can anyone >offer me detailed information on which SCSI controller is best to run >with BSD? I'm about to buy one. I ran an Adaptec 174x on a box for quite some time, it was fantastic. don't get a 274x series card, it's incompatible. -- Jaye Mathisen, COE Systems Manager (406) 994-4780 410 Roberts Hall,Dept. of Computer Science Montana State University,Bozeman MT 59717 osyjm@cs.montana.edu