*BSD News Article 2339


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.unix.bsd:2382 comp.unix.misc:4448 comp.sys.sun.admin:3902 comp.unix.admin:6523 comp.unix.internals:5043 comp.unix.solaris:7 comp.unix.sysv386:21796 comp.unix.wizards:26209
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!network.ucsd.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!atha!canada!nebulus!dennis
From: dennis@nebulus.ca (Dennis S. Breckenridge)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.misc,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.solaris,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: AT&T sues BSDI
Keywords: BSDI AT&T
Message-ID: <1992Jul23.173415.11587@nebulus.ca>
Date: 23 Jul 92 17:34:15 GMT
References: <83873@netnews.upenn.edu> <1992Jul20.211811.3152@algor2.algorists.com> <54661@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <83@ampr.ab.ca>
Organization: Alchemy Mindworks, Edmonton, Alberta
Lines: 28

lyndon@ampr.ab.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) writes:

>I discovered yesterday that AT&T is the long distance carrier for
>Cantel (the biggest cellular telephone carrier in Canada), at least for
>calls placed from Alberta and British Columbia. (Strange, eh?)

Cellular One has a billing relationship with Cantel as well. I get
them as my carrier when I travel to the U.S. with my cell phone. I
wonder if they have a similar relationship. I too will complain to
Cantel. 

This is not the first time the Corporate Giant squashes the little
guy in litigation expenses. Send your $1000.00 to BSDI and get a 
source license now. They will need the money and we will benefit
as well. AT&T Canada put an individual in the poor house a couple
of years ago. It was splattered all over W5. 

This thread is splintered all over the place. Can we all post to 
comp.unix.bsd. The AT&T <-> BSDI is showing up everywhere. There
are good ideas in all of the groups, but it would benefit all if
we kept it in one group. 

Boycott AT&T
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dennis S. Breckenridge VE7TCP@VE7TCP [44.135.160.59]  dennis@nebulus.ca
Just because everything is different doesn't mean anything has changed - Oracle
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------