Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!library.ucla.edu!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!wlbr!sms From: sms@WLV.IIPO.GTEGSC.COM (Steven M. Schultz) Subject: Re: BSD for Alpha ? Message-ID: <1993Nov5.052844.3617@wlbr.iipo.gtegsc.com> Sender: news@wlbr.iipo.gtegsc.com (news) Nntp-Posting-Host: wlv.iipo.gtegsc.com Organization: GTE Government Systems References: <wilko.752255896@spoetnix.idca.tds.philips.nl> <VIXIE.93Nov3014358@pc.home.vix.com> <MIKE.93Nov3094037@majestix.cs.uoregon.edu> Date: Fri, 5 Nov 93 05:28:44 GMT Lines: 16 In article <MIKE.93Nov3094037@majestix.cs.uoregon.edu> mike@majestix.cs.uoregon.edu (Mike Haertel) writes: >Just for the sake of nostalgia... >$ ls -l v7/*unix >-rw-rw-r-- 1 root 53302 Feb 14 1993 v7/hphtunix >-rw-rw-r-- 1 root 52850 Feb 14 1993 v7/hptmunix >-rw-rw-r-- 1 root 51790 Feb 14 1993 v7/rphtunix >-rw-rw-r-- 1 root 51274 Feb 14 1993 v7/rptmunix Those look like strip'd sizes (the output from "size" would be more interesting) - the V7 kernels i used were almost twice that big, of course we'd hacked in kernel overlays to make everything fit. Assuming a split I/D kernel there was 56-64kb of code which is by itself larger than the sizes listed above. Steven Schultz sms@wlv.iipo.gtegsc.com