Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.development:2282 comp.os.386bsd.development:1342 Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.386bsd.development,alt.os.bsdi Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!wariat.org!kf8nh!bsa From: bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org (Brandon S. Allbery) Subject: Re: ugly name for core dumps (core.imagename) -> patch for "img.core" References: <13326@dirac.physics.purdue.edu> <1993Oct27.170050.1573@matuc2.mat.uc.pt> Organization: Brandon's Linux box and AmPR node, Mentor, OH Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1993 23:40:25 GMT Message-ID: <1993Oct27.234025.11194@kf8nh.wariat.org> Lines: 12 In article <1993Oct27.170050.1573@matuc2.mat.uc.pt> rps@matuc2.mat.uc.pt (Rui Pedro Mendes Salgueiro) writes: > 1 - 'name.core' is better than 'core.name', but now is a little > late to change things. If all you care about is BSD 4.4 compatibility, maybe. The Linux folks debating this don't necessarily need to be bound by that.... ++Brandon -- Brandon S. Allbery kf8nh@kf8nh.ampr.org bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org "MSDOS didn't get as bad as it is overnight -- it took over ten years of careful development." ---dmeggins@aix1.uottawa.ca