*BSD News Article 22638


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.clark.edu!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.sys.pc-clone.gateway2000,comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Re: FreeBSD install problems on Gateway2000 DX66V
Message-ID: <199310201530.IAA00230@corbin.rain.com>
From: davidg@implode.rain.com (David Greenman)
Date: 20 Oct 1993 11:08:00 -0500
Reply-To: davidg@implode.rain.com
Sender: daemon@cs.utexas.edu
Organization: UTexas Mail-to-News Gateway
NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu
Lines: 30

>I tried installation first with internal and external CPU caches on,
>and it hung on the first "Do you want to install FreeBSD (y/n)"
>question, after I put in the filesystem-floppy.  It may also have
>hung immediately after printing the initial banner, where you get an
>opportunity to give it another kernel name, but I'm not so sure on
>that one.

Very suspicious. What kind of disk are you using? I suspect disk driver
problems - especially if it's a 'wd' style (IDE/ST506/ESDI) disk.

>When I turned both caches off, I managed to get all the way through
>the install process, reboot, fsck cleans up filesystem, reboot, get
>login: prompt.  The machine would ALWAYS hang at this point.  I
>repeated the process, hitting my machine's Reset button on each reboot
>even though I don't have an Ethernet card, but no luck there either.
>I gave up at that point.  Even if I had been able to log in I would
>have dumped the system, because I don't consider running my machine
>with caches off a viable option.

Again, sounds like a bug in the 'wd' driver - most other failures would likely
have generated some kind of message telling you what was wrong.

>FYI, I am now running NetBSD without any problems whatsoever, aside
>from my own cluelessness. :)  I still haven't gotten mail to work...

They're using a different 'wd' driver that works better for some folks. It's a
bit dubious to call there's "better", but it sounds like it works for you.

-DG