Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uknet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news From: bs@Germany.EU.net (Bernard Steiner) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: 386BSD or NetBSD? Date: 5 Oct 1993 12:35:53 +0100 Organization: EUnet Deutschland GmbH, Dortmund, Germany Lines: 14 Distribution: world Message-ID: <28rm6p$c23@Germany.EU.net> References: <9310041624.AA0109@havoc.ns.doe.gov> <crt.749753294@tiamat.umd.umich.edu> <28porg$mno@homer.cs.mcgill.ca> <crt.749774550@tiamat.umd.umich.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: qwerty.germany.eu.net In article <crt.749774550@tiamat.umd.umich.edu>, crt@tiamat.umd.umich.edu (Rob Shady) writes: |> Damn.. I never meant to give that impression, here, let me correct myself. |> |> 386BSD - Very, VERY buggy! Unstable w/o patch kit. Since you are talking about 0.1, I'd just like to say this: You folks don't know about the pain to get a 386BSD 0.0 running with only one floppy configured in the kernel, and being unable to boot off wd0a. ;-) Bernard