Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!aardvark.ucs.uoknor.edu!ns1.nodak.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!news.clark.edu!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!caen!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!tiamat.umd.umich.edu!crt Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: 386BSD or NetBSD? Message-ID: <crt.749753294@tiamat.umd.umich.edu> From: crt@tiamat.umd.umich.edu (Rob Shady) Date: 4 Oct 1993 12:50:30 -0400 References: <9310041624.AA0109@havoc.ns.doe.gov> Organization: Univerisity of Michigan - Dearborn NNTP-Posting-Host: cw-u02.umd.umich.edu Lines: 16 martinj@havoc.ns.doe.gov (James Martin ) writes: >I'm bringing up a new box to act as a secondary nameserver and was wondering >wether it should be 386BSD or NetBSD? I've had a 386BSD box running for about a >year running named and some other stuff, is NetBSD very different (the readme >files say it's 386BSD with patches - is this true?). Is NetBSD a pain to get >running? <BZZZTT!> Not! 386BSD - Very, VERY buggy! FreeBSD - 386BSD with patches & minor enhancements. NetBSD - 386BSD with patches & MAJOR enhancements! Linux - ... Well, not worth mentioning. ;)