Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!linac!uchinews!machine!chinet!randy From: randy@chinet.chi.il.us (Randy Suess) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: problems bringing up 386BSD 0.1 Message-ID: <1992Jul21.040158.5844@chinet.chi.il.us> Date: 21 Jul 92 04:01:58 GMT Article-I.D.: chinet.1992Jul21.040158.5844 References: <RAEBURN.92Jul17141049@cambridge.cygnus.com> <michaelv.711604391@help.cc.iastate.edu> <greg.711645054@hibp1.ecse.rpi.edu> Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX Lines: 21 In article <greg.711645054@hibp1.ecse.rpi.edu> greg@ecse.rpi.edu (Greg) writes: >>In <RAEBURN.92Jul17141049@cambridge.cygnus.com> raeburn@cambridge.cygnus.com (Ken Raeburn) writes: >>>Using ftp to copy something from a remote machine to local disk is very >>>slow. Local disk-to-disk copy is fast, ftp into /dev/null is fast; it's >>[...] >>>drivers). I'm using an NE2000 card configured for IRQ 9, which is what > I am also using an ne2000 at irq 9. It is also VERY SLOW!! I have tried both a wd8003e 16 bit card and a ne2000 clone. The wd8003e was left at int 2/9, but I re-compiled the kernel and put the ne2000 at int 11. I get 1.1e+02 kbytes/s ftp'ing with both. (these are large 2-10 meg files). The 0.1 system is a 33mhz 386 with a couple IDE drives, and the other system is a 33mhz 486 sysvr4 system with a wd8003e. -- I am created Shiva the Destroyer; Death, the shatterer of worlds! Who is this dog meat who stands before me now? That's the biz, sweetheart. Randy Suess randy@chinet.chi.il.us