Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:5157 comp.os.386bsd.misc:1029 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!usenet.coe.montana.edu!bsd.coe.montana.edu!nate From: nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu (Nate Williams) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: NetBSD-0.9 partitioning Date: 16 Sep 1993 23:35:25 GMT Organization: Montana Stateu University, Bozeman MT Lines: 29 Message-ID: <27at7t$jup@pdq.coe.montana.edu> References: <1993Sep8.231610.9740@ccds3.ntu.edu.tw> <JTSILLA.93Sep12213741@damon.ccs.northeastern.edu> <277do6$4hj@fw.novatel.ca> <hastyCDGHIw.L8F@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bsd.coe.montana.edu In article <hastyCDGHIw.L8F@netcom.com>, Amancio Hasty Jr <hasty@netcom.com> wrote: >In article <277do6$4hj@fw.novatel.ca> hpeyerl@novatel.ca (Herb Peyerl) writes: >>I don't understand what all the whining is about... I see nothing wrong >>with a little bit of parallelism... After all; where would the world be > >We do have a very strong competition and it is called Linux. >If we wish to win against linux, we are going to need everything >that we got plus a bit more like in terms of marketing to spread >the *bsd word around. > Competition? I don't think you can call two freely available *nix operating systems *competition*. I would much rather see folks be using Linux than be moving towards using NT, or DOS. That is where the *competition* should be. Long live *ALL* free uni*es. Nate -- nate@bsd.coe.montana.edu | In the middle of it ........ again. nate@cs.montana.edu | Running/supporting one of many freely available work #: (406) 994-4836 | Operating Systems for [34]86 machines. home #: (406) 586-0579 | (based on Net/2, called FreeBSD today :-)