Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!hrd769.brooks.af.mil!hrd769.brooks.af.mil!not-for-mail From: burgess@hrd769.brooks.af.mil (Dave Burgess) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Subject: Re: Which to use for the non-kept up? Date: 12 Sep 1993 19:41:40 -0500 Organization: Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB, TX Lines: 27 Message-ID: <270fki$d0o@hrd769.brooks.af.mil> References: <26q1os$fm9@ns1.arlut.utexas.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: hrd769.brooks.af.mil In article <26q1os$fm9@ns1.arlut.utexas.edu> pug@arlut.utexas.edu (Richard Bainter) writes: > >Good Morning, > Good Evening. > not something I have the time for right now. I've picked up the > 386bsd FAQ recently, but does it apply for FreeBSD and NetBSD or do > they have their own FAQ? It had better, or I am doing a lot of useless work to make it do it. If they have their own FAQs, I would dearly love to see them. I am thinking about changeing the name in the FAQ from 386bsd.faq to BNR2-der.faq (Berkeley Net Release 2 Derived FAQ). I have been moving more and more in that general direction over the past month or so, and I am really liking the outcome for those sections I have done. Your FAQ maintainer (for another three weeks, if I don't have a reasonable feed in Omaha)... -- ------ TSgt Dave Burgess NCOIC AL/Management Information Systems Office Brooks AFB, TX