Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!tools!ms From: ms@tools.de (Michael Schaake) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: RE: What are the various PC... Date: 10 Sep 93 07:41:51 GMT Organization: TooLs GmbH, Bonn, Germany Lines: 12 Message-ID: <MS.93Sep10084151@fred.tools.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: fred.tools.de We tried to find a difference in speed on a 486DX2 66 with a Local Bus IDE controller and a AT-Bus IDE controller under Nextstep 486 and NetBsd. The hard drive we were using was a 512MB Conner drive. The benchmarks we got were just the same (something about 980 kb/sec). So is there really an advantage in using a Local Bus IDE controller? Michael Schaake --------------- ms@tools.de