Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!mips!mips!pacbell.com!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!dwex From: dwex@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (david.e.wexelblat) Subject: Re: status of X11R5 for 386bsd0.1 Organization: AT&T Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1992 16:53:03 GMT Message-ID: <1992Jul19.165303.18300@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> References: <sbbmf+g.hasty@netcom.com> Lines: 31 In article <sbbmf+g.hasty@netcom.com> hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) writes: > Hi, > In response to several requests for X11R5 binaries: > I have been working on X386-2E under 386bsd 0.0 for sometime now. > Currently, is fully operational. What I intend to do is to bring it up > under 0.1. Provided of course, that I can boot my system under 0.1. > Estimated time to make X11R5 available under 0.1 and to distribute > the binaries is about 2 days,provided that the new kernel does not > introduce any new bugs. > > Cheers, > Amancio Just to pick some nits... The name of this software is "X386 1.2E 1.0". Please use the correct name. SGCS (Mark Snitily and Thomas Roell) have graciously allowed are use of this name, even though it could cause confusion with their commercial product (currently X386 1.3, some day X386 2.0). Let's try very hard not to lose this privilege. All you need to do is remember that this offering is derived from X386 1.2, which was distributed with MIT X11R5. Now back to your regular programming. :-> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- David Wexelblat | dwex@mtgzfs3.att.com | Somebody get me a AT&T Bell Laboratories | ...!att!mtgzfs3!dwex | cheeseburger! 200 Laurel Ave - 4B-421 | | Middletown, NJ 07748 | (908) 957-5871 | --Steve Miller Band