*BSD News Article 20420


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux.development:766 comp.os.mach:3251 comp.os.minix:22629 comp.unix.bsd:12544 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:4320 comp.os.386bsd.misc:860 comp.os.386bsd.development:1179
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.mach,comp.os.minix,comp.unix.bsd,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,comp.os.386bsd.misc,comp.os.386bsd.development
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!jmonroy
From: jmonroy@netcom.com (Jesus Monroy Jr)
Subject: A few words about BSDI
Message-ID: <jmonroyCCtzDv.2vE@netcom.com>
Followup-To: /dev/null 
Keywords: BSDI review 
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 1993 13:13:07 GMT
Lines: 63

 
        SunWorld   Sept. 1993
 
        Article in discussion
        ---------------------
        Unix on x86, Part 1
        ---------------------
 
                The stumbling blocks of the PC are now coming to light
        with the inept persceptions of individuals claiming to be
        hackers at best.  One often wonders as to professional nature
        of this venture, BSDi, but since they seem to have the deep
        pockets for a court room fight, far be it for me to deter the
        actions of business-in-motion.
 
                I have often wondered if Rob Kolstad was more than the
        mere marketing guru of this omnipresent organization.
        However, as I continued to be plumeled with references to my own
        competence, I have decided to make the new friends that I do.
 
                USL's concerns make me wonder how this incident could
        have occured; a question I think everyone has.  To date Bill
        Jolitz, author of 386bsd - a Public Domain version similar to
        BSDI's OS , has stated that he would prefer to remain unquoted
        on this subject; saying at most the entire incident is "stupid".
 
        --------------------------oOo--------------------------------
 
                About the article, it seems that BSDi hard coded the
        floppy drive/disk to use at boot-time; the 3 1/2" diskette
        drive is culpurit in this circumstance.   Albeit that such a
        trivial item is in reality a nusicance to life, it shows the
        lack of prerequisite intelligence to this minimualistic
        application.
 
                Here's a clue guys.... both the 3 1/2" diskette and
        the 5 1/4" have at least 15 sectors.  Owww..what a revelation!
 
                Here's another clue... use rtc_in().. Gee did I spill
        some properitary information.
 
                I guess in all respects I shouldn't be so rough on
        these guys, cause the people at SunWorld had just as much
        problem installing other commercial versions of *nix.  It does
        seem that all this cuteness surrounding the PC is coming to
        light.  No marketing whiz is available for this klunkiness GUYS..
        a bug can be called an undocumented feature, but a bad feature
        is just that... bad.   Gee, with a comment like that you might
        think the whole world is inept.   So true is the world on this
        issue that I often wonder if all the real programers are
        working on MS-DOS products.
 
                Let's give some good news on this.  "The total time to
        complete installation (of the BSDI OS) was almost a day."
 
                "Hardwire Hell" terms the marketing haunt for the PC.
        Welcome aboard, Boys.... Have a nice day.
 
___________________________________________________________________________
Jesus Monroy Jr                                          jmonroy@netcom.com
/386BSD/device-drivers /fd /qic /clock /documentation
___________________________________________________________________________