Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!convex!news.oc.com!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!math.fu-berlin.de!uni-paderborn.de!pbhrzx.uni-paderborn.de!n62274
From: n62274@pbhrzx.uni-paderborn.de (Kl.Schaefers)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps
Subject: Re: I _compiled_ olvwm on 0.9, anyone else?
Date: 2 Sep 93 15:57:22 GMT
Organization: Universitaet Paderborn, Germany
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <n62274.746985442@pbhrzx.uni-paderborn.de>
References: <263hmf$pv@fnnews.fnal.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pbhrzx.uni-paderborn.de
Keywords: open look olwm olvwm window manager
dejan@cdfsga.fnal.gov (Dejan Vucinic) writes:
>Hi Net,
Hello,
[...]
>However, I don't think this is the way to go 'cause what I did was
>really terrible. First of all, it was persistently trying to find
>LC_MESSAGE (!?) in locale.h, so if there is some sun-guru out there
yes, same here. I def`ed it to 7 , because sombody did it that way too.
I ` ve used a linux box to look at a non-sun-running-system ...
>perhaps he might explain this? Second, the code refers to step() and
>compile() (!??) that obviously don't exist anywhere, at least on my
>box so I (ahem 8*) commented them out... It SEEMS to be working just
>fine, but if it explodes on your box don't ask me. :)
no such things here .
>Now serious: LC_MESSAGE you shouldn't need unless you're opposite of
>[Greenwich|Date Line] and really want your favourite language in menus.
>The other problem is mentioned in README and those functions seem to be
>resolved on SunOS---got no clue as I never touched a Sun. This part
>seems to be connected to regular expression matching or somehting like
>that, so it might blow up with the first config file... Don't know,
>didn't try it. If anyone already did this please enlighten me.
>BTW, the whole thing is AWFUL! those people are leaving SPACES
>after continuation backslash in a Makefile, imagine what kind of
>nasty language does BSD (and GNU) make produce on that kind of food.
>Yacc also screams on olvwmrc.y. But the virtual screens were worth
>the trouble. ;>
yes,yes,yes.
I`am wondering, why so less people here are interested in xview3.X .
Or are they talking about netbsd / XFree / xview3.X in other groups ?
>Cheers,
>Dejan
so long,
Klaus
--
/ \ n62274@pbhrzx.uni-paderborn.de
<< * >> klaus@elostar.ms.sub.org
\ / Fidonet: 2:242/55.21
Realname: Klaus Schaefers