*BSD News Article 1985


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!think.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!cv3.cv.nrao.edu!laphroaig!cflatter
From: cflatter@nrao.edu (Chris Flatters)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
Subject: Re: Sorry, everyone, but I'm cpio clueless...
Message-ID: <1992Jul17.180345.1296@nrao.edu>
Date: 17 Jul 92 18:03:45 GMT
Article-I.D.: nrao.1992Jul17.180345.1296
References: <1992Jul17.160256.4518@news.iastate.edu>
Sender: news@nrao.edu
Reply-To: cflatter@nrao.edu
Organization: NRAO
Lines: 30

In article 4518@news.iastate.edu, musik@iastate.edu () writes:
>Evidently the distribution of 386bsd 0.1 is cpio'd...
>The bindist directory contains a slew of files named
>bin01.00 thru bin01.56 and the MANIFEST.
>The INSTALL.NOTES say that this is ten floppies...
>Do I just copy this stuff to floppies and then use
>the install procedures outlined?  Or... do I need
>to do something cpio-ish with these files before
>I put them on the floppies, i.e. while they're still 
>on the UNIX system I'm ftp'ing them with.

For those that a REALLY clueless about cpio: cpio is an archive program/format
that may be used as an alternative to tar.  It has a rather more flexible
command line format than tar.

If concatenated together, the bin01.?? files form a compressed cpio
archive file.  I am pretty certain that the bin01.?? should be copied
to messy-dos floppies.  I think that loadfd just copies them from the
floppies to /tmp (presumably using mread from the mtools package.  The
extract command then checks the bin01.??  files and, if they pass
muster, passes them through a pipeline that concatenates them,
uncompresses the result, and extracts the system from the cpio
archive.

Since I just got a new system unit (the old one went flatline) with a new
120 Meg IDE drive it seems like a good time to try 386BSD instead of Linux
so I'll try this out this evening.

	Chris Flatters
	cflatter@nrao.edu