Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!xlink.net!pilhuhn!hwr From: hwr@pilhuhn.sub.org (Heiko W.Rupp) Subject: Re: Using the sio ports with a Modem References: <CBHLwJ.737@flatlin.ka.sub.org> <1993Aug9.213957.18706@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <CBq5Ct.6LH@flatlin.ka.sub.org> <1993Aug15.231636.17182@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1993 19:03:39 GMT Organization: The home of the Pilhuhn Message-ID: <CC6Cy3.3Bs@pilhuhn.sub.org> Lines: 18 terry@cs.weber.edu (A Wizard of Earth C) writes: >In article <CBq5Ct.6LH@flatlin.ka.sub.org> bad@flatlin.ka.sub.org (Christoph Badura) writes: >> [ about FAS, which works well ] >Then port FAS and be done with it; I'll assume that it doesn't require that >consumers rewrite the serial driver portions of applications like uucp, and >if that is the case, iut already obeys the semantics I described with >reference to the SVR3/SVR4 serial drivers... ie: it doesn't break the >existing practice codified in hundreds of applications. There exist working solutions, like at Sun or NeXT - existing uucp code runs on these boxes, so following thoses examples need no big rewrites on the user side. I don't know the SVR4 code, but I know of working BSD-code, so why not use this as example. -- Heiko W.Rupp Gerwigstr.5 D-76131 Karlsruhe +49 721 9661521 "So, jetzt muss ich los: Maenner betoeren." -- Carla auf der RP Passau