Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.apps Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!headwall.Stanford.EDU!kithrup.com!sef From: sef@kithrup.com (Sean Eric Fagan) Subject: Re: recent version (4.x) of gdb Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. References: <MCKIM.93Aug11164110@dinah.lerc.nasa.gov> <1993Aug12.164411.25282@newstand.syr.edu> <MCKIM.93Aug15065541@dinah.lerc.nasa.gov> <JDOLTER.93Aug15075604@sawtooth.eecs.umich.edu> Message-ID: <CBt6FC.EKE@kithrup.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1993 16:13:45 GMT Lines: 11 In article <JDOLTER.93Aug15075604@sawtooth.eecs.umich.edu> jdolter@eecs.umich.edu (James W. Dolter) writes: >I have started playing with it but other deadlines keep interfering. I've done an initial port of gdb to the current netbsd. It seems to work. I've asked other people to take a look at it, to clean it up and whatnot. (In particular, I'd *really* like to get the people doing non-x86 ports of NetBSD to play with it :).) Anyway, assuming it all works, the changes will be folded into the mainstream BFD tree, and all of the binutils should "just work."