Return to BSD News archive
Xref: sserve comp.os.386bsd.questions:3436 comp.unix.bsd:12161 Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!mbsun.mlb.org!mbsun.mlb.org!not-for-mail From: mike@mbsun.mlb.org (Mike Bernson) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions,alt.os.bsdi,comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: 386BSD vs. BSD386 Date: 30 Jun 1993 23:25:58 -0400 Organization: Mico Lines: 16 Message-ID: <20tlg6$o3t@mbsun.mlb.org> References: <bigbobC9FK42.CpK@netcom.com> <hastyC9FwCw.Esw@netcom.com> <1993Jun30.214329.9688@news.arc.nasa.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: mbsun.mlb.org In article <1993Jun30.214329.9688@news.arc.nasa.gov> mnewell@lupine.nsi.nasa.gov (Mike Newell) writes: > >Just out of curiosity, did you report the problem to BSDI >for a fix? I'm curious as to their responsivness to user problems. > >Mike Newell >NASA Advanced Network Applications I have reported this type of problem but not with x. BSDI has never gone past 24 hours in getting me a patch for a kernel panic. (I might also state they have not had to do many patch since 1.0) For all of the unix vendor that i have used in the pasted BSDI is the best I have seen. ---- Mike Bernson mike@mbsun.mlb.org