Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!newsserver.jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!umd5.umd.edu!roissy.umd.edu!mark From: mark@roissy.umd.edu (Mark Sienkiewicz) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Subject: Re: 386BSD Participation Date: 25 Jun 1993 20:19:54 GMT Organization: University of Maryland Lines: 22 Message-ID: <20fmla$i4i@umd5.umd.edu> References: <1993Jun25.140526.1385@jpl-devvax.jpl.nasa.gov> <1993Jun25.145818.13457@bert.eecs.uic.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: roissy.umd.edu In article <1993Jun25.145818.13457@bert.eecs.uic.edu> zmola@bert.eecs.uic.edu (Carl Zmola) writes: >kaleb@octopus (Kaleb Keithley) writes: > >>Press 'n' now to avoid more mindless drivel :-) > >... No one is perfect, but there is no reason to flame on the net. >If you don't like it, use a different system. Emminently reasonable advice! .. Only problem is: that's what started this flamewar. :) [ for those who don't remember that far back-- Netbsd was a case of people going off in a different direction because they didn't "like it". Then both sides were flamed for Not Cooperating. Now someone is saying "if you don't like it use a different system". Pretty good, huh? ] Mark S. p.s. This has been quite entertaining, but for REAL flameage, go check out the SCO groups. I hear comp.*.386bsd.* is pretty tame by comparison.. :)