Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.misc Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!darwin.sura.net!nih-csl!helix.nih.gov!crtb From: crtb@helix.nih.gov (Chuck Bacon) Subject: Re: BNR2SS vs xxxBSD... Message-ID: <1993Jun10.131437.6941@alw.nih.gov> Sender: postman@alw.nih.gov (AMDS Postmaster) Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda References: <1993Jun9.192816.1021@coe.montana.edu> <1v5f9g$4oh@europa.eng.gtefsd.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1993 13:14:37 GMT Lines: 15 In article <1v5f9g$4oh@europa.eng.gtefsd.com> niemidc@oasis.gtefsd.com writes: >I'm still sorry for having accidentally touched off this latest 386BSD vs. NetBSD >round. Me and my big mouth. > >At least both camps know how to spell "kernel". Over in the Microsoft advocacy >group lots of people use "kernal" to describe the Windows NoT macrokernal. Maybe >because Bill Gates spells it that way. >--- >David C. Niemi: David.Niemi@oasis.gtegsc.com >My opinions are those of my fuzz-brained, cat-sniffing Norwegian Elkhound. Some hobbiests over their dont no there ass from a whole in the ground. -- Chuck Bacon - crtb@helix.nih.gov ( alas, not my 3b1 )-: ABHOR SECRECY - DEFEND PRIVACY