*BSD News Article 16908


Return to BSD News archive

Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!uunet!gatekeeper.us.oracle.com!barrnet.net!noc.usfca.edu!noc.usfca.edu!callis
From: callis@noc.usfca.edu (Kim C. Callis)
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Subject: Boot question
Date: 6 Jun 1993 11:17:18 GMT
Organization: University of San Francisco
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <1usjnu$jm2@noc.usfca.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: noc.usfca.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL0]

I am making the switch from Linux to 386BSD... I want to know two
things...Actually three!

1.) Does 386BSD have to initially occupy the first physical boot HD on my
system, or can I place it on another HD and have a boot-time loader (ala
LILO for Linux) start it up.

2.) For those who have used Linux, are the networking features of 386BSD
better? I have for the longest time attempted to tie into our campus
network, with no success...

3.) Also for those who have previously used Linux, or even currently use
linux, which is the better system, and could I possibly get a
pro/con-compare/contrast of the two rather than a simply one liner...

Thanks...Since I know this is probably an old topic, please e-mail me.

--
*******************************************************************
* Kim C. Callis                                                   * 
* Univ. of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA                       *
* EMAIL: callis@usfca.edu or callis@dons.ac.usfca.edu             *
*******************************************************************
DISCLAIMER: As long as nothing I say attempts to represent the 
views of the Univ. of San Francisco, they could care less what I 
have to say. Meaning that anything said, like it or not, is strictly
my own personal opinion and views.