Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!convex!convex!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: Why 386BSD? Message-ID: <hastyC8AJHK.491@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <1uv9vc$6q8@vermeer.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <1993Jun7.202341.25245@coe.montana.edu> <ALBERTO.93Jun8152940@bear.ishiilab.dnj.ynu.ac.jp> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1993 07:00:56 GMT Lines: 29 In article <ALBERTO.93Jun8152940@bear.ishiilab.dnj.ynu.ac.jp> Alberto@ishiilab.dnj.ynu.ac.jp (Alberto Tomita Junior) writes: >In article <1993Jun7.202341.25245@coe.montana.edu> nate@cs.montana.edu (Nate Williams) writes: > >>In article <1uv9vc$6q8@vermeer.ecs.soton.ac.uk> jfb292@ecs.soton.ac.uk (James Berry) writes: > >Linux seems to have greatter support for MS-DOS and a wide hardware >compatibility, but I could't find a hardware compatibility list for >386BSD to compare. > >Any coments are wellcome. The performance of lets say a Ferrari is directly proportional to the performance of the driver. Come on lets get real here :-) State what are your needs for the OS and perhaps we can answer the original posted: Which os is better Linux, 386bsd, or SCO? Amancio Hasty P.S: our time is also money -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail hasty@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming