Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!constellation!osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!csus.edu!netcom.com!hasty From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Subject: Re: Why 386BSD? Message-ID: <hastyC89IJy.93w@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <1uv9vc$6q8@vermeer.ecs.soton.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1993 17:43:10 GMT Lines: 22 In article <1uv9vc$6q8@vermeer.ecs.soton.ac.uk> jfb292@ecs.soton.ac.uk (James Berry) writes: >Are there any reasons why I should choose 386BSD rather than, say, >Linux or SCO? > >I'm trying to evaluate which Unix to use and would welcome an >UNBIASED opinion weighing up the pros and cons of each system please. > >James. Why don't you try running both Linux or 386bsd and then give us your unbiased opinion. Or, you can research our news achive for issues concerning Linux vs. 386BSB. Both Linux and 386bsd are fairly easy to install. Amancio -- This message brought to you by the letters X and S and the number 3 Amancio Hasty | Home: (415) 495-3046 | ftp-site depository of all my work: e-mail hasty@netcom.com | sunvis.rtpnc.epa.gov:/pub/386bsd/incoming