Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!manuel!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!kithrup!sef From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd Subject: Re: gcc 2.2.2 or 386BSD bug? Message-ID: <1992Jun24.210332.7464@kithrup.COM> Date: 24 Jun 92 21:03:32 GMT Article-I.D.: kithrup.1992Jun24.210332.7464 References: <1992Jun23.194137.3165@email.tuwien.ac.at> <1992Jun23.232355.1382@gateway.novell.com> <1992Jun24.053953.5550@serval.net.wsu.edu> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Lines: 13 In article <1992Jun24.053953.5550@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@phys1.physics.wsu.edu (Hongjiu Lu) writes: >>I don't know of any UNIX (or any >>other OS, for that matter) written in entirely conforming ANSI C. >Take a look at Linux. Last time I looked at it, Linux used inline assembly statements. It is not, therefore, a conforming application. -- Sean Eric Fagan | "My psychiatrist says I have a messiah sef@kithrup.COM | complex. But I forgive him." -----------------+ -- Jim Carrey Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.