Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!wupost!uunet!psinntp!uuneo!sugar!peter From: peter@NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Which is better ? Organization: NeoSoft Communications Services -- (713) 684-5900 Date: Sun, 30 May 1993 23:05:54 GMT Message-ID: <C7v45v.HM@sugar.NeoSoft.COM> References: <3528@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> <1993May28.050433.24371@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1u5l7q$i4m@umcc.umcc.umich.edu> Lines: 16 In article <1u5l7q$i4m@umcc.umcc.umich.edu> lcd@umcc.umcc.umich.edu (Leon Dent) writes: > Suppose Linux and [386|Net]bsd had equal reliablity. Does BSD have some > performance or capacity edge over Linux? BSD networking is better. There are some VERY interesting special-purpose file systems coming out for BSD, like the Vista file system. BSD is ported to the 386 from other platforms. I've got a fighting chance at porting it to something else (like my Amiga, or a VAX). -- Peter da Silva. <peter@sugar.neosoft.com>. `-_-' Har du kramat din varg idag? 'U` "Det er min ledsager, det er ikke drikkepenge."