Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!netnews.nwnet.net!serval!hlu From: hlu@eecs.wsu.edu (HJ Lu) Subject: Re: Which is better ? Message-ID: <1993May28.201031.6850@serval.net.wsu.edu> Sender: news@serval.net.wsu.edu (USENET News System) Organization: School of EECS, Washington State University References: <1993May25.095207.25469@uxmail.ust.hk> <1u0u1h$jt6@umcc.umcc.umich.edu> <3528@bigfoot.first.gmd.de> <1993May28.050433.24371@serval.net.wsu.edu> <1u5l7q$i4m@umcc.umcc.umich.edu> Date: Fri, 28 May 93 20:10:31 GMT Lines: 14 In article <1u5l7q$i4m@umcc.umcc.umich.edu>, lcd@umcc.umcc.umich.edu (Leon Dent) writes: |> What I was getting at with my question was... |> Suppose Linux and [386|Net]bsd had equal reliablity. Does BSD have some |> performance or capacity edge over Linux? |> You are starting a flame war. If possible, try them both. Or pick one by random. Since I am working on Linux only, don't expect an unbiased answer from me. Without the shared libraries, I don't think 386bsd will have any real performance edge over Linux. BTW, if you are doing FP stuff, Linux may be better for you. H.J.