*BSD News Article 16508


Return to BSD News archive

Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!ra!cs.umd.edu!nocusuhs!nmrdc1!dsc3pzp
From: dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Philip Perucci)
Subject: Re: Which is better ?
Message-ID: <C7MsvI.4oq@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil>
Organization: Naval Medical Research & Development Command
References: <1993May25.095207.25469@uxmail.ust.hk> <C7LC9D.DG6@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> <1993May25.212403.14269@cm.cf.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 May 1993 11:21:17 GMT
Lines: 34

In article <1993May25.212403.14269@cm.cf.ac.uk> paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul) writes:
>However, comp.os.386bsd.questions should be exactly that sort of
>forum.  If we're not going to spend a little time answering newbie
>questions and yes I know we're all busy doing the work that keeps
>us alive, then 386bsd is never going to gain ground amongst the
>broader user base. One of the things that does worry me is the total
>lack of traffic in the 386bsd groups, while I know that there are
>people out there working on things it seems that there isn't much
>of a base actually using the stuff we develop.
>

As a current Linux user, but NetBSD "wanna-run" I feel that the reason the
user base for NetBSD/386BSD is not any larger is the lack of shared libraries
which results in greatly increased hard disk requirements as compared with
Linux.  Also, there is no "idiot-proof" installation of XFree86 with 
NetBSD as with Linux's SLS distribution, though this is a lesser issue.

Most PCs are too small to run NetBSD.  With my 240Mb Quantum, I am just now
able to run NetBSD (thank God!).  Yes, I know - the high disk requirements
are not inconsistant with the 386BSD role as a "research tool". 

Personally, I am happy to WAIT until shared libraries are done "right", rather
than the "just-do-it" philosophy found elsewhere.  However, until the shared
libraries come out, "if you want to play, you will have to pay (hard disk)".

I suspect that the more sophisticated developers are happy NOT to have a large
"MS-DOS convert" number of users.  Being only a marginal C programmer myself,
however, I can only guess...
 
-- 
==============================================================================
  phil perucci                       | "Any opinions expressed are my views, 
  dsc3pzp@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil |  not the position of any organization"
==============================================================================