*BSD News Article 16054


Return to BSD News archive

Xref: sserve comp.os.linux:38726 comp.os.386bsd.questions:2417 comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:2728
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,comp.os.386bsd.questions,comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!boulder!ophelia!drew
From: drew@ophelia.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt)
Subject: Re: IDE vs SCSI  and intermixing the two.
Message-ID: <1993May14.025404.12607@colorado.edu>
Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
Nntp-Posting-Host: ophelia.cs.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
References: <1993May13.182917.23510@mav.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1993 02:54:04 GMT
Lines: 34

In article <1993May13.182917.23510@mav.com> stu@mav.com writes:
>I haven't been paying much attention to the advent of IDE controllers
>over the last few years, and would like to know a few things.
>
>	1) Is it true that IDE controllers/drives appear like the
>	   original ST506 drives on ISA bus systems?

Yes.

>	2) What about software compatibility with IDE controllers?
>	   Specifically do 386BSD and Linux work with IDE controllers?

Yes.

>	3) Can you intermix IDE with SCSI?  meaning can you have an
>	   IDE drive, and a SCSI board, with both drive and other 
>	   scsi peripherls?  How abut under Linux or 386BSD?

Yes and yes.
>
>
>And, just another point, what about IDE or SCSI controllers
>and the VESA Local bus?

IDE localbus controllers work just like ISA bus IDE controllers.
Local bus SCSI controllers work if they are compatable with a 
supported non-local bus board, and we have explicit support for 
the Ultrastor 34F VESA local bus SCSI.


-- 
Boycott USL/Novell for their absurd anti-BSDI lawsuit. | Drew Eckhardt
Condemn Colorado for Amendment Two.		       | drew@cs.Colorado.EDU
Use Linux, the fast, flexible, and free 386 unix       |