Return to BSD News archive
Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.questions
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!news.Hawaii.Edu!ames!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!uunet!mcsun!uknet!warwick!qmw-dcs!qmw!demon!horse.demon.co.uk!tomd
From: Tom Davies <tomd@horse.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Q: Going directly to patchkit 0.2.3
Message-ID: <C6oBn3.9Au@demon.co.uk>
X-Xxmessage-Id: <A8108549BF0108B0@horse.demon.co.uk>
X-Xxdate: Fri, 7 May 93 21:29:45 GMT
Sender: news@demon.co.uk
Nntp-Posting-Host: horse.demon.co.uk
Organization: None
X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17
Date: Fri, 7 May 1993 20:30:39 GMT
Lines: 22
I'm confused about upgrading from BSD0.1.20 (i.e. no patches at all) to
patchkit 0.2.3.
My question is: do I need to work my way to 0.2.3 via 0.2.2? Or can I go
direct to 0.2.3?
The existence of a specific 0.2.2-0.2.3 patchkit seems to imply the
latter,
but point 1 in the UPGRADE-0.2.3 readme file says:
> 1. Install patchkit 0.2.2. You must be at patchkit 0.2.2 for this
> upgrade to work.
This implies that I'll need to install 0.2.2 first.
What's the story?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Davies - 14 Rotterdam Drive, London E14 3JA, 071 987 0392
- tomd@horse.demon.co.uk
-----PGP 2.0 PUBLIC KEY AVAILABLE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------