Return to BSD News archive
Path: sserve!newshost.anu.edu.au!munnari.oz.au!goanna!escargot!minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU!s902113 From: s902113@minyos.xx.rmit.OZ.AU (Luke Mewburn) Newsgroups: comp.os.386bsd.bugs Subject: Re: elvis bug Message-ID: <1s7pfeINNeln@escargot.xx.rmit.OZ.AU> Date: 5 May 93 07:13:50 GMT References: <1rr14f$t31@Germany.EU.net> <1993Apr30.200643.3856@fwi.uva.nl> Reply-To: zak@rmit.edu.au Organization: Not RMIT (this is an implicit disclaimer :) Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au bosman@fwi.uva.nl (Cor Bosman) writes: > bs@Germany.EU.net (Bernard Steiner) writes: >> [mentions possible problem in elvis...] > Why not just use 'vi'? the REAL vi.. im sorry to say so..but to me > elvis just doesnt do it. Its buggy and just strange. > Go for vi :) Well, unfortunately, a lot of people are unlucky and don't have an AT&T or BSD source license which enables you access to the ex/vi sources. Too bad Net/2 and/or bsd4.4 doesn't have a non-at&t vi :( > cor > -- > |bosman@fwi.uva.nl_ // | Honest Officer , had I known my health | > |-----------------\\ //AMIGA | stood in jeopardy I would never had lit one.| > | PE no.1 \\/ | -MAXIM (of the Hells Angels)- | > |__________ Quickly Scotty,beam me up.There is no ox..y..ge..._____________|